Gavin Has an interesting series of links about Christian Pacifism.
These are interesting arguments, and ones I struggle with myself. By no means am I an expert on Roman military structure, however I was in the active duty Army for four years working in Psychological Operations. It is not a Combat Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), but a Combat Support MOS. As the ads say, there are 212 ways to be an soldier in the U.S. Army. That's not including all the jobs in the Navy, Marine Corp, Air Force, or the Coast Guard. In the Army, everyone is trained in basic combat and soldiering skills, but very few are actually call upon to do the down and dirty work of killing the enemy (or as the weasel words go, "rendering the opposing forces combat ineffective.") The majority of the Army is made up of combat support (like Psyop, Engineers, Signal Corps, Military Police, Chemical Corp) and Combat Service Support (Office workers, chaplains, doctors, cooks, transport, and supply). None of these jobs have roles in which they are actively engaged with the enemy.
So, can a soldier be in a combat service support (CSS) or combat support (CS) unit and still live a pacifistic-like life? If you never directly harm another human being, yet enable others to do so, can you call yourself a pacifist? I would say that my initial response would be, no, as an enabler, I could not call myself a pacifist in a CS or CSS MOS. So how many steps away must one get before you are no longer culpable for the violence done by a military force? As a voter and a tax payer, I am, in effect, contributing to the war effort. My representatives may vote for war. My tax dollars are used to supply troops with everything from food and water, to rifles and rounds. Am I responsible?
How 'bout this: One of my many duties as Psyop was information dissemination (that'd be propaganda without the lying). We were well trained in surrender appeals and ultimatums. Via leaflets, handouts, posters, television and radio broadcasts as well as loud speakers, we informed our target audiences why they should not fight and how to surrender without being killed. Our job was to reduce battlefield casualties of both our enemies as well as allied forces. Mind you, the combat units hated us, because they generally would rather shoot people. I'm not trying to demonize them, it's just the truth from my direct experiences with infantry soldiers. Now, at anytime our position was compromised and the Psywar wasn't working, we were expected to fight as and along side combat soldiers. This is true with any CS or CSS soldier in the field. Considering all that I've said about the job of Psyop, could it be considered pacifistic either as a whole or to a degree?
If I were to be asked to come back into the military (and miraculously my gouty arthritis was cured), honestly I think I would fight my reactivation citing that I was now a conscientious objector. I don't want to take a life, not even in the defense of my own or those of my fiends. I would die for a friend, but I would not kill. To do otherwise would go against my conscience, and what I belief the example shown by Christ, the apostles, and the martyrs that came after.
In the mean time, I'm still voting and paying taxes. Prayerfully and begrudgingly; respectively and in that order.
P.S. Remember, you can't spell "pacifist" without "fist."
SLOW
-
The brand new official SLOW Mobile App is now available! Stream our music,
see pictures, check out our bio, and share it all with your friends. Stay
connec...
44 minutes ago
